fix: add Solana API type #61
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a schema and type modification to support Solana API integration. The changes are focused on expanding the network configuration capabilities by adding a new "solana" API type to the existing JSON schema and TypeScript type definitions. This enhancement allows for more flexible blockchain API configurations while maintaining the existing structural integrity of the schema and type system. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Schema as networks.schema.json
participant Types as src/types.ts
Schema->>Types: Extend API type support
Types-->>Schema: Validate Solana API configuration
The sequence diagram illustrates how the schema and type definitions collaborate to support the new Solana API type, ensuring type safety and configuration validation across the system. Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
networks.schema.json (1)
16-17: Consider adding Solana-specific properties to the schemaWhile the addition of "solana" to the API types is correct, the schema might benefit from Solana-specific properties to properly type and validate Solana network configurations.
Consider extending the schema to include Solana-specific properties such as:
- Commitment levels
- RPC API version
- Program IDs
- Account encoding format
Would you like assistance in designing these schema extensions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
networks.schema.json(1 hunks)src/types.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/types.ts (1)
17-18: LGTM: ApiType extension is properly implemented
The addition of the "solana" API type maintains the union type structure and aligns with the schema definition.
Let's verify the alignment between types.ts and schema:
✅ Verification successful
API types are correctly synchronized between schema and TypeScript
The verification confirms perfect alignment between the API types defined in the schema and those implemented in types.ts. Both sources contain identical entries in the same order:
- evm
- tendermint-rpc
- tendermint-http
- cosmos-http
- tendermint-ws
- cosmos-grpc
- evm-ws
- blockcypher
- esplora
- solana
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify API types are consistent between schema and TypeScript
# Expected: All API types from schema should be present in types.ts
# Extract API types from schema
echo "Schema API types:"
jq -r '.definitions.api_type.enum[]' networks.schema.json
# Extract API types from TypeScript
echo -e "\nTypeScript API types:"
rg -o '"[^"]*"' src/types.ts | grep -v "eslint-disable" | grep -v "This file"
Length of output: 482
networks.schema.json (1)
16-17: Verify the impact on existing network configurations
The schema change looks good, but we should ensure existing configurations remain valid.
Let's check for any existing network configurations that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
API types in network configurations are compatible with schema changes
After analyzing the network configurations, I can confirm that the existing API types ("esplora", "solana") are already in use and valid:
- "esplora" is used in btc_mainnet and btc_testnet configurations
- "solana" is used in solana_devnet configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check existing network configurations for API type usage
# Expected: No undefined API types in existing configurations
# Search for network configuration files
echo "Checking network configurations for API types:"
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg -l '"type":\s*"[^"]*"' || echo "No network configuration files found"
Length of output: 204
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the network configurations to verify the API types
echo "Content of data/networks.json:"
cat data/networks.json
echo -e "\nChecking for specific API type usage:"
rg -A 2 '"type":\s*"[^"]*"' data/networks.json
Length of output: 20163
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes